Thought of in the place of reported public referent acceptance and you may connection connection and you can effort
Lover needs in matchmaking
Felmlee, D. H. (2001). Away from appealing to appalling: Disenchantment which have a romantic spouse. Sociological Views, 44, 263-280. [ Hyperlinks ]
Fiore, A great. T., & Donath, J. (2005). Homophily in matchmaking: Whenever can you for example anyone such as for instance oneself? CHI, fulfilling towards the human factors when you look at the measuring assistance. https://kissbrides.com/sv/argentinska-kvinnor/ 1317-1374. [ Links ]
Furman, W. (1985)patibility and you can incompatibility inside the youngsters’ fellow and you can aunt matchmaking. From inside the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will in conflict relationships (pp. 61-87). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]
Gattis, K. S., Berns, S., Simpson, L. Elizabeth., & Christensen, Good. (2004). Wild birds regarding a beneficial feather or uncommon birds? Links certainly identification size, similarity, and you may ily Therapy, 4, 564-574. [ Backlinks ]
Gaunt, R. (2006). Few resemblance and you can relationship fulfillment: Try comparable partners happy. Record regarding Character, 74, 1401-1420. [ Links ]
Goffman, E. (1952). Towards cooling the prospective out: Some aspect of version in order to inability. Psychiatry, fifteen, 451-463. [ Hyperlinks ]
Gonzaga, Grams. C., Campos, B., & Bradbury, T. (2007). Resemblance, convergence, and relationship fulfillment into the matchmaking and you may married couples. Journal of Identity and you may Social Mindset, 93, 34-forty eight. [ Links ]
Personal Relationships, fifteen, 281-295
Hatfield, Age., & Sprecher, S. (1986). Reflect, mirror: The necessity of seems inside everyday life. Albany: State College or university of new York Drive. [ Website links ]
Hatfield, E., & Sprecher, S. (2009). Matching hypothesis. Within the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of peoples relationships (Vol. 2, pp. 10651067). Newbury Playground, CA: Sage. [ Links ]
Hatfield, Elizabeth., Traupmann, J., Sprecher, S., Utne, Meters., & Existe, J. (1985). Guarantee and you will romantic connections: Current search. During the W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you can in conflict dating (pp. 91-117). New york: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]
Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsu, A beneficial., & Ariely, D. (2010). Coordinating and you may sorting during the online dating. Western Financial Remark, 100, 130-163. [ Website links ]
Houran, J., Lange, R., Rentfrow, J. P., & Bruckner, K. H. (2004). Do online relationship tests work? An evaluation regarding first evidence to possess an advertised ‘predictive brand of erican Log of Therapy, 6, 507-526. [ Backlinks ]
Houts, Roentgen. Meters., Robins, Age., & Huston, T. L. (1996)patibility plus the development of preily, 58, 7-20. [ Backlinks ]
Huston, T., Niehuis, S., & Smith, S. (2001). The first relationship roots away from conjugal worry and divorce. Latest Tips during the Psychological Technology, ten, 116-119. [ Backlinks ]
Ickes, W. (1985). Introduction. When you look at the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible dating (pp. 1-7). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Hyperlinks ]
Ickes, W., & Charania, Yards. R. (2009)patibility. Within the H. T. Reis & S. Sprecher (Eds.), Encyclopedia of person relationships (Vol. step one, pp. 283-286). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. [ Website links ]
Kalick, S. Yards., & Hamilton III, T. E. (1986). This new complimentary theory reexamined. Journal from Identity and you will Personal Psychology, 51 , 673-682. [ Backlinks ]
Karney, B. Roentgen., & Bradbury, T. Letter. (1995). The longitudinal course of relationship high quality and stability: A glance at principle, methods, and you can lookup. Mental Bulletin, 118, 3-34. [ Links ]
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1997). Neuroticism, relationship interaction, therefore the trajectory from relationship satisfaction. Diary off Character and you can Personal Psychology, 72, 1075-1092. [ Hyperlinks ]
Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (2005). Contextual impacts toward matrimony: Implications for rules and you may input. Current Advice during the Psychological Science, fourteen, 171-174. [ Backlinks ]
Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, Age., Christensen, A beneficial., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G. Peterson, D.Roentgen. (1983). Examining close relationships. Inside H. H. Kelley, E. Berscheid, An excellent. Christensen, J. H. Harvey, T. L. Huston, G. Levinger. D. Roentgen. Peterson (Eds.), Personal relationship (pp. 20-67). Nyc: Freeman. [ Links ]
